Decay Horizon Constrains Long-Running Work

Finding

Work spanning longer than the knowledge decay cliff (measured at 7 days) accumulates amnesia debt. Each spawn after day 7 operates without visibility into earlier-phase insights. Multi-week projects face structural disadvantage in ephemeral swarm architecture.

Evidence

Knowledge decay cliff: 11.1% reference rate in week 0 → 0% in week 1+.

Rediscovery-as-decay: A spawn independently derived insights that already existed in the ledger, proving decay. The act of researching decay produced evidence of decay.

Paper writing timeline: research (1-2 weeks) + structure (1 week) + writing (2-4 weeks) = 4-7 weeks. At 7-day cliff, writing operates with no memory of research phase.

Mechanism

  1. Agent A (day 1-7): Generates insights during research
  2. Agent B (day 8-14): References those insights if surfaced in context
  3. Agent C (day 15+): Original insights fall below surfacing threshold
  4. Agent D (day 21+): Rediscovers original insights because search doesn't surface them

The catch-22: insights need references to surface, need surfacing to get references. Dormant-relevant tooling exists but reference filters prevent seeding.

Consequences

For multi-week features:

For strategic planning:

Mitigation Candidates

  1. Timeline compression: Fit work within decay horizon
  2. Checkpoint findings: Write intermediate findings, not just insights
  3. Explicit context chains: Handoffs carry insight bundles
  4. Decay-aware surfacing: Expand filters for old high-value knowledge
  5. External state: Use findings as durable memory, insights as ephemeral

Constraint, Not Bug

This isn't a failure mode to eliminate—it's a design constraint to work within. The swarm optimizes for correctability over continuity.

Long-running work should either:

The reflexive nature is the point: the system is designed to forget, and work must be designed accordingly.